Skip to main content

What Does Delivering to Satan Mean?


What does delivering a person to Satan in 1 Corinthians 5:5 mean? Paul said this regarding the person who lives with his father’s wife or stepmother, a sin considered particularly grave in the Christian context. This sin is not found among those who have not known Christ. Paul says such a thing is “not tolerated even among pagans” (1 Cor 5:1). When he heard about this, Paul wrote to the Corinthian church “to deliver this man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh.”

This is not the only place where Paul used this expression. Later, while writing to Timothy, he said he had “handed over to Satan” Hymenaeus and Alexander so they may learn not to blaspheme (1 Tim 1:20).

Some think that Paul intends the death of the sinner so that he may not continue in his sinful flesh to sin more and lose his eternity. Does Paul suggest that this man should die now “so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord?” But it is unreasonable to think that the community of believers have the right to decide on matters of life and death.

“Delivering to Satan” could also mean withdrawing the spiritual protection that the community offers to each individual through intercessions and spiritual support. This spiritual protection is the shield that believers have against the influence of Satan. Believers are delivered from the sphere of Satan to the realm of God’s salvation. The world outside of those in Christ is Satan’s domain: “We know that we are from God, and the whole world lies in the power of the evil one” (1 John 5:19; see also Eph 2:1—2).

This second view is close to what Paul has in mind because this elaborates on what he had already stated in the previous verse: “Let him who has done this be removed from among you” (1 Corinthians 5:2). Excommunicating this sinful member will serve two purposes: as Paul elaborates in the following verses (6—8). Removing the sinner is essential for the purity of the community and will allow the errant member to learn God’s ways when chastised by Satan.

This reminds us of the parable of the prodigal son. The father could not keep him at home but had to release him to his choices. But the son repents and returns when faced with the harshness of life outside the safety of his father’s home.

If we assume that the repentant sinner mentioned in the second letter is the same person in the first letter who lived with his stepmother, a different picture emerges. Paul advises the church to embrace him with love: “So you should rather turn to forgive and comfort him, or he may be overwhelmed by excessive sorrow” (2 Cor 2:7). Whatever “delivering over to Satan” means, it is clear that the community has a crucial role to play in the sinner’s redemption. It is a collective responsibility to ensure that the sinner is not overwhelmed by sorrow and is guided back to righteousness.

While we may not have a definitive answer to this enigma, the intention behind this command is remedial. The hope is that “his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord” (1 Cor 5:5). Keeping the sinner in the community would only serve to pollute it, so releasing him to the world outside is done with the optimistic hope that he will one day return. The belief is that life in the community under the reign of Christ is far better than being a slave to sin.

Popular posts from this blog

Pandita Ramabai versus Swami Vivekananda: Two Visions of India

This is more than a story about two remarkable nineteenth-century Indians. It is a story about two competing ways of seeing India itself. Pandita Ramabai and Swami Vivekananda were contemporaries, reformers, and influential voices who introduced India to the Western world. Swami Vivekananda (b. 1863—d. 1902 and Pandita Ramabai (b. 1858—d.1922) were contemporaries for about 39 years. Pandita Ramabai was five years older than the Swami and lived 20 more years than he did. Both individuals had connections to Brahmo Samaj. Swami Vivekananda was an official member, whereas Pandita Ramabai closely aligned with its principles and members but did not formally join. When Ramabai arrived in Kolkata in 1878, she received a warm welcome from Brahmo Samaj leaders such as Keshab Chandra Sen, who was notably impressed by her Sanskrit skills and encouraged her to study the Vedas, which were traditionally restricted to men. Although she adopted many of the movement's social reform ideas—such as opp...

A Chat With God

A Chat With God : Prayer can sometimes be a tough thing for people. This video takes a look at some of the struggles and thoughts a person might have with prayer, through the lens of a 'chat' conversation with God.

The Smoking Meat-Eating Swami

  Typically, we imagine a revered spiritual monk as a quiet figure subsisting on fresh vegetables, clear water, and pure air, untouched by worldly habits. However, Swami Vivekananda challenges this traditional image entirely. His life was characterised not by a strict adherence to conventions but by practical wisdom, profound humanity, and a bold rejection of superficial dogma. Throughout his life, Vivekananda regularly enjoyed cigars, pipes, and the traditional Indian hookah. It was a habit he picked up in his youth and maintained during his travels across India and abroad. Yet, for him, a simple pipe could carry profound spiritual meaning. During his wanderings across India, he once asked a man from a lower caste for a smoke from his hookah. When the man hesitated because of the era’s strict customs of untouchability, Vivekananda initially walked away—only to turn around immediately, realising that bowing to caste distinctions violated his core belief in spiritual unity. He took ...